|
|
The Registration DisciplinesThe Clinical Physiology Disciplines represented on the RCCP are:-
Your own Discipline may have specific advice on Voluntary Registration with the RCCP. Please check the appropriate website. Council Members and RepresentativesClick this link to view the List of Council Members and the Representatives for each Clinical Physiology Discipline. Example Registration Form
Click this link to view the Example Form published by the RCCP to give you an idea of the sort of things you should be including. To download this word document to your own disc drive right-click the link and use 'Save Target As...' The Health Professions CouncilThe HPC has been set up to safeguard the health and well-being of patients using the services of the professions it regulates and to ensure that the public has access to and are treated by health professionals who are qualified and competent. The Federation for Healthcare ScienceThe Federation was formed in 2002 as an overarching body for the professional organisations representing healthcare scientists. The Federation will provide a collective voice for science in the health service to the government, other health care professionals and to members of the public. The forty plus professions, groups and disciplines within healthcare science are grouped into three main sections, based primarily on the underlying branch of science from which they originate. Physiological Science if one of the three branches. For more information on FHCS - See the website at www.fedhcs.net Accredited DegreesA degree bearing the name of Clinical Physiology is not necessarily the true vocational degree that RCCP will accredit. It is advisable before starting trainees on a course to check the status of that course. Regular updates of accredited centres will be made available to you all through your professional bodies and this website. See Accredited Provider List
(on Education page).
Department of Health Consultation Document - March 2004 Enhancing Public Protection: Proposals for the Statutory Regulation of Healthcare Support Staff in England and Wales - March 2004 (View this document) The consultation document proposes to extend the current system of regulation of healthcare professionals to include Healthcare Support Staff. The paper seeks views on the inclusion of Healthcare Support Staff in statutory regulation. The Department of Health is requesting feedback on this
document. (See also resulting documents below - published 14 July 2006) The Regulation of the Non-Medical Healthcare Professions: A review by the Department of Health - 14 July 2006This document flows from the work of a review of non-medical professional regulation, which was set up in March 2005 by the then Secretary of State, John Reid. It deals with the regulation of health care professionals other than doctors. View the report here: The Regulation of the Non-Medical Healthcare Professions: A review by the Department of Health The Universal Ethical Code for ScientistsFollowing conversations at a Carnegie meeting (a regular informal meeting of science ministers and advisers from G8 countries) in 2004, Sir David King, the government’s Chief Scientific Adviser, convened a small working group to help him to consider the issues around developing a universal ethical code of conduct for scientists. The group agreed that it would be most useful to develop a set of guidelines. See Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Website. Extending Professional Regulation Working Group Interim Report: Protecting the public by ensuring that workforce standards are metIn February 2007 the Government White Paper “Trust, Assurance, Safety – The regulation of health professionals in the 21st Century” set out Government proposals for improving public safety by strengthening the system of professional regulation for health care professionals. The paper also considered plans for extending statutory regulation to more healthcare professions / occupational groups. A Working Group of representatives from across the UK, including from health and social care sectors, academia, regulatory bodies, and government have been tasked with taking forward this complex area of health policy. This interim report sets out our thinking so far, and makes recommendations about the work that is required before a final report can be submitted on this subject. See Extending Prof Reg Working Group Interim Report |